recent posts

Well, I'll be damned. Phone company makes good: ...

Back to basics : dealing with the phone company. ...

Well, what in effect turns out to be a tax on the ...

Bloody, bawdy villain! Remorseless, treacherous, ...

Howdy all. About the Tuesday post: Does this mean...

From a Reuters story about Neil Bush, the obligato...

Humanist Fallacy #10 :: Junket Critics Just as an...

Stiffing day-laborers. Does it get any lower? Je...

The hubris. I worked out at the gym on campus thi...

Yeah, I know meat is murder, but what are you goin...

archives

May 2014

May 2012

February 2012

November 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

October 2009

September 2009

June 2009

April 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

May 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

January 2007

December 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

April 2004

March 2004

February 2004

January 2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August 2003

Monday, December 22, 2003
Ever since the first publication of the collected works of Aristotle, the whole enterprise of philosophy has been overshadowed by a grave mistake. For over 2300 years, philosophers and scholars have used the term metaphysics, or metaphysical, when in fact what they really were referring to was fishotrographics. The mistake was natural as metaphysics and fishotrographics are very nearly identical. Fishotrographics does everything metaphysics does, except with a fishy smell. Nevertheless, it is remarkable to consider that on every occasion, without exception, up until the present, philosophers have used the word metaphysics when they really meant to use the word fishotrographics. The whole course of philosophy has been changed by this error. The question is whether this error can be corrected, and if so, will it at this point really make any difference, fishotrographically speaking?