recent posts

Well, what in effect turns out to be a tax on the ...

Bloody, bawdy villain! Remorseless, treacherous, ...

Howdy all. About the Tuesday post: Does this mean...

From a Reuters story about Neil Bush, the obligato...

Humanist Fallacy #10 :: Junket Critics Just as an...

Stiffing day-laborers. Does it get any lower? Je...

The hubris. I worked out at the gym on campus thi...

Yeah, I know meat is murder, but what are you goin...

Halloween was a night of pizza delivery horrors. ...

I've concluded that this is a hoax, or, well, a sa...

archives

May 2014

May 2012

February 2012

November 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

October 2009

September 2009

June 2009

April 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

May 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

January 2007

December 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

April 2004

March 2004

February 2004

January 2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August 2003

Friday, December 19, 2003
Back to basics : dealing with the phone company. Does it get any more primal?

Is "Bonnie" a codename for an automatic response generator? If not, my message might have been as effectively answered by a machine. There is no indication in the response that she actually read my message.

I had contacted my bank before originally phoning SBC. As a result of the incident, I closed my account with the bank. My point in contacting you is: when I originally contacted you after speaking with my back, I was informed by your cs rep that, without the proper account no., my check would not be able to be applied. I was told that my check couldn't even be tracked, so I should put a stop payment on it. That was apparently incorrect information, because the check was applied, but weeks after it had originally been sent and after I had put the stop payment on it. That is why I requested a reversal of the fee.

Obviously, I've already wasted more than $7 of my time in contesting this. It would be satisfying nevertheless to see that something there is capable of an unmechanical act.

One other note: contacting you by email is unnecessarily difficult, perhaps deliberately so. Still, it would be a bit less insulting if one were able to reply to an email from your cs directly, rather than having to navigate back to this form and refill in all the information.

Thanks,

Tomo
________________

Dear Mr. Idokoro,

Thank you for your recent email. You would need to check with your
bank regarding in errors that might have been made with their
automatic payment service. We did however, receive this payment of
$18.95 and then payment was rejected, just like a returned check.
When a payment is returned or debited, a $6.65 fee does apply.

If you need any further assistance, please send us an email by using
the form located at:
http://sbc.com/erms/ca/res/email-us/, or you can contact our Customer
Sales and Service Center at (800) 310-2355.

Thank you for choosing SBC California. We appreciate your business
and continued loyalty.

Sincerely,

Bonnie
SBC California Customer Service
http://sbc.com/erms/ca/res/home/


NOTICE
We've done our best to answer your questions based on the information
you provided, our understanding of your request, and current
information we have (which is subject to change). Also, please note
that prices, terms, and conditions are subject to change, and in the
event of a discrepancy, prices, terms and conditions in any
applicable tariffs govern. This message contains information which
may be confidential. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to
receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy, re-transmit, or
disclose to anyone this message or any information contained therein.
If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender
by reply e-mail ONLINECA@sbc.com, and delete the message. Thank you
very much.

--
On Tue Dec 16 17:19:13 PST 2003, Tomohiro Idokoro wrote:
> To: ONLINECA@txmail.sbc.com
> Customer Name: Tomohiro Idokoro
> Email Address: tidokoro@hotmail.com
> Street: No Street
> City: No City
> State: --
> Zip: -----
>
> Message:
> Hi,
>
> I notice my current online bill includes a Return Payment charge of
$18.95 and a Return Check fee of $6.95, both dated 10/26. I believe
this is related to a screw-up by my former online bank (NetBank). I
had tried to pay on-line using their service, but they had listed the
wrong account number in posting the check to you. The payment had
not been posted on the date it was supposed to have been. After I
tracked down the error and talked to Netbank's customer service, I
called your customer service and was advised by a rep to stop payment
on the check as it could not be applied without the proper account
number listed with it. I followed this advice and on 16 Oct sent in
a paper check for $39.97 covering the month in error as well as the
bill for the month then current (October).
>
> I don't understand why the original payment was even applied, much
less applied then reversed with a $6 penalty to me. Perhaps the
misdirected check subsequently was applied and then reversed,
resulting in the charges above?
>
> I have paid the full amount on my current bill, but I have the
following requests:
>
> 1) Please reverse the $6.65 return check fee as this check should
never have been applied in the first place.
>
> 2) Please reverse any other penalties, such as late fees, resulting
from this Return Payment as the matter should have been resolved when
I stopped payment on the original Netbank check and sent in the paper
check from my Washington Mutual account
>
> 3) Please review my account to insure that all charges and payments
have been reconciled and that I have not been doubled bill for any
months.
>
> I have tried to do this last item myself online, but it is
difficult to find a clear history of my account history on your
website.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Tomohiro Idokoro