recent posts

Market Froth

Jackson/Tyson

The Interest-Only Loan

The May Short Figures on Home Depot

Betting on the Bubble

New Yorker Caption Contest #8

One Year from Today

New Yorker Caption Contest #7

New Yorker Caption Contest #7

New Yorker Caption Contest #7

archives

May 2014

May 2012

February 2012

November 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

October 2009

September 2009

June 2009

April 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

May 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

January 2007

December 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

April 2004

March 2004

February 2004

January 2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August 2003

Thursday, June 16, 2005
More conservative spin:

Studies Rebut Earlier Report on Pledges of Virginity

Challenging earlier findings, two studies from the Heritage Foundation reported yesterday that young people who took virginity pledges had lower rates of acquiring sexually transmitted diseases and engaged in fewer risky sexual behaviors.

The new findings were based on the same national survey used by earlier studies and conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services. But the authors of the new study used different methods of statistical analysis from those in an earlier one that was widely publicized, making direct comparisons difficult.

...Those who made pledges were less likely to engage in vaginal intercourse, oral sex, anal sex and sex with a prostitute, and they were less likely to become prostitutes than were adolescents who did not take such a pledge, the Heritage team said.


They may not prostitute themselves sexually, but they'll prostitute themselves.

Seriously, I would guess (and that's a little more empirical than what the Heritage Foundation researchers did) that the decision to become a prostitute is driven by factors mostly unconnected to sex education and any difference is largely arbitrary.

As for less teens having vaginal intercourse. In truth, that figure is beside the point. The more critical queston: are they more or less likely to have vaginal intercourse (or anal sex or oral sex) without a condom?